Defending DUI’s Under the New Law: The Nuts & Bolts of Defending a DUI Case

By Stephen Hayne

Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Cross of Cop Checklist

  1. REPORT
    • Have made many stops before/since def.
    • Purpose to make record of details
    • Include everything important
    • Reviewed prior to the trial
    • Had to refer to it many times on direct
    • Couldn’t recall many specifics without it
    • Have ticketed many people before/since
    • Have written many reports
    • Monthly average of tickets
    • Monthly average of DUI citations
    • Name of person ticketed before client
    • Have never been wrong
    • Have sometimes mixed up facts of one case with another

  2. PROFESSIONAL WITNESS
    • Trained how to testify at academy
    • Lots of practice
    • Never testified DUI defendant not under influence
    • Never testified for a defendant in a DUI case
    • No medical degree
    • Based opinion on observations of def that night

  3. BIAS

    • Do you drink
    • Drive after drinking
    • Agree not inherently unsafe
    • Ever in accident involving drunk driver
    • In middle of night – you look for drunk drivers
    • When first noticed client, suspicious might be drunk driver
    • Often see people do what client did who have had zero to drink

  4. DRIVING
    • Sped up to catch client
    • How fast did you go
    • Your speed not necessarily dangerous, was it
    • Client’s speed constant
    • Proper lane travel
    • Signaled
    • Responded properly to emergency lights
    • Parked safely
    • No problem:
      • placing car in park
      • setting brake
      • opening window
      • producing license
      • understanding requests
      • undoing seat belt
      • getting wallet out
      • putting wallet away
      • opening door
      • stepping out of car
      • closing door
      • Didn’t appear unsteady on feet
      • No problem walking to shoulder

  5. SETTING FST SCENE
    • Parked your car at angle behind client’s
    • Had client move to shoulder because traffic dangerous
    • How wide was shoulder
    • Gravel/guard rail at shoulder’s edge
    • Traffic continued to pass in adjacent lane
    • Left emergency lights on
    • Left headlights on/bright
    • Did client face towards or away from traffic (if toward: blinded by headlights – if away: no warning as cars whizzed by)
    • Cop’s experience with FST’s:
      • First performed at academy
      • Hundreds of times since
      • First time in middle of day
      • In well-lit room
      • When well-rested
      • When relaxed
      • No traffic whizzing by
      • No traffic whizzing by
      • Comfortable temperature
      • Didn’t do as well first time as now
      • Got better with practice

    • Back to FST scene
      • Middle of your work day
      • Well after defendant’s normal bedtime
      • Dark
      • Numerous moving shadows/distractions
      • Cold/wind
      • At least some slope
      • Gravel/debris collects on shoulder
      • Don’t know how long since last swept
      • Bystanders/other officers
      • Chatter from police radio
      • Distractions from passing cars

    • What FST’s actually measure:
    • Intended to measure general balance, coordination and ability to follow instructions
    • Use same tests for everyone
    • The tests do not vary depending on differences in:

      • Age
      • Physical condition
      • Illness
      • Fatigue
      • Suitability of the FST site
      • Nervousness
      • Whether overweight
      • Type of shoes
      • Type of clothing

    • Most people nervous when stopped
    • Normal for people to make physical and mental mistakes when nervous
    • Don’t know what was going through client’s mind during these tests
    • No objective way to measure level of nervousness of client

  6. INDIVIDUAL TESTS

    • ABC’s
      • Didn’t ask when client last performed
      • Don’t know if last week or in third grade
      • Didn’t give client chance to practice
      • Didn’t give client second chance
      • Did you take notes at the scene
      • Where are notes now

    • RHOMBERG/BALANCE
      • Looking for numerous symptoms
      • Ability to understand and follow instructions
      • Ability to maintain balance
      • Client did:
        • Put heels together
        • Hold arms at side
        • Tilt head back
        • Close eyes

      • Did not tell client not to sway
      • Did not tell him to stop swaying
      • Afterwards, didn’t tell him he swayed and let him try again
      • Not normal to keep arms at side while balancing, is it

    • FINGER TO NOSE
      • Again looking for several things
      • Ability to understand and follow instructions
      • Ability to tough tip of nose with finger tip
      • In fact, client did follow those instructions up to very end
      • You didn’t give client second chance

    • HEEL TO TOE
      • Looking for numerous mistakes:
        • Ability to understand and follow directions
        • In fact, client did [list all he did correctly]
        • Imaginary line
        • Some people have difficulty with balance even when sober
        • Didn’t allow client to practice
        • Didn’t note distance between heel and toe
        • So to you, ½” is same as 3”
        • Unnatural to do test without raising arms

  7. NO BASIS FOR COMPARING CLIENT’S PERFORMANCE
    • Had never met client before that night
    • Have never heard or seen him:
      • Speak
      • Walk
      • Stand
      • Do balance tests

    • Agree alcohol effects people differently
    • Effect of alcohol can depend on:
      • Amount of rest person had
      • What person’s had to eat
      • Individual metabolism
      • Tolerance
      • Drinking habits
      • What a person is drinking
      • Over what period of time

    • You don’t know any of those things about my client
    • No knowledge of what’s “normal” for client
    • Odor doesn’t tell how much a person’s had to drink
    • Odor doesn’t tell you whether person affected
    • Watery-bloodshot eyes doesn’t mean person intoxicated
    • Pupils affected by intoxication
    • Normally slow to react if significant amount of alcohol in system
    • Didn’t measure pupil reaction did you

  8. NO PROBABLE CAUSE UNTIL AFTER TEST
    • Didn’t arrest until end of tests
    • Must arrest when have probable cause
    • PC means “reasonable grounds”
    • So didn’t conclude had reasonable grounds [after each field sobriety test]
    • There was still question in your own mind until very end

  9. MIRANDA RIGHTS UNDERSTOOD/242 RIGHTS
    • Read Miranda rights to def
    • Read 242 rights to jury
    • Satisfied client understood
    • Didn’t express any confusion
    • Readily agreed to answer questions
    • Readily agreed to take breath test
    • Fully cooperated/did not request attorney

  10. NO FST’S AT STATION
    • How long with client in total
    • Ever out of your sight prior to breath test
    • Never went to bathroom
    • In no particular hurry
    • Agree FST conditions much better at station
    • Didn’t have client do same FST’s at station

  11. CONTINUOUS OBSERVATION
    • Kept client under continuous observation prior to DM Required by WAC
    • To make sure client doesn’t put anything in mouth or belch
    • Must enter data
    • Using the Keyboard

  12. RADIO FREQUENCE INTERFERENCE
    • DM located in middle of police station
    • Officers free to come in and out
    • No sign warning keep walkie talkie’s off
    • Police transmitter located in building
    • Parking for patrol cars nearby
    • Microwave
    • Computers
    • Copiers
    • Police radios

  13. CONCLUSION

    • Fully cooperative throughout
    • Didn’t note any unusual actions
    • Didn’t note any unusual statements
    • Didn’t ask client why he hit fog line
    • If putting in tape, etc, would have less significance than not paying attention
    • Didn’t do follow up investigation per client’s explanation
    • Didn’t talk to client’s witnesses
    • Didn’t talk to bartender, etc